Meltman wrote:npdavis wrote:Meltman wrote:Man, look at this. A whole article written about a Tweet that had nothing to do with PWG. It's the first sentence that gets me that most. It sounds so factual, yet couldn't be more untrue. Just like Hollywood tabloids.
So you know for a fact that PWG never discussed bringing in Jeff Hardy? You sound so factual, so I'm assuming you talked to the owners and/or an inside source.
"PWG" showed up on Hardy's Twitter, the article posted here was written based on that single update, and then everyone realized he was talking about his band.
Do the math.
I'm thinking their idea of "preliminary internal discussion" was basically this Twitter post from Matt Jackson to Joey Ryan after the Hardy
"Hey @joeymagnumryan, I wonder if @jeffhardybrand is busy in late November?"